Full Description

Enterococci and Escherichia coli (E. coli) analyses are recommended as a measure of recreational waterquality. Epidemiological studies have led to the development of criteria that have been used topromulgate recreational water quality standards based on established relationships between health effectsand water quality. Methods for enterococci (Methods 1106.1 and 1600) and E. coli (Methods 1103.1 and1603) have been approved for ambient water quality monitoring. Bacterial analysis of non-potable waters(e.g., wastewater) for compliance monitoring requires that sample analysis begin within 6 hours of samplecollection (40 CFR Part 136, Table II). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) conducted a study to determine whether marineand freshwater samples analyzed for enterococci (Methods 1106.1 and 1600) and freshwater samplesanalyzed for E. coli (Methods 1103.1 and 1603) could be held for longer than 6 hours prior to sampleanalysis without a significant change in bacterial concentrations. Samples were analyzed at 0, 6, and 24hours after sample collection or sample spiking. Time zero samples were analyzed within two hours ofsample collection or sample spiking.Thirteen volunteer laboratories participated in the holding time study, with six to eight freshwater ormarine matrices being evaluated using each of the methods noted above. Each laboratory evaluated"range-finding" fresh and/or marine water matrices to determine if sufficient ambient levels ofenterococci and/or E. coli were present and whether sample spiking was required. If the target bacterialconcentrations less than or equal to 150 CFU/100 mL, laboratories spiked samples. All results were natural log-transformed prior to performing any statistical analyses as a result of theskewed distribution of the results. All results also were stratified by method and matrix. For each methodand matrix, a two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model was fit to assess the effect of holding timeand laboratory on the log-transformed concentrations, and to assess whether there was a significantinteraction between holding time and laboratory. For Methods 1600 and 1103.1 in freshwater, there wasno significant interaction between holding time and laboratory, and, as a result, pairwise comparisonswere performed in a single ANOVA model using data from all laboratories. For all other method/matrixcombinations, there was a significant interaction between holding time and laboratory, and therefore anANOVA model was fit for each laboratory separately. Within each ANOVA model, comparisonsbetween each of the three holding times were performed using the Tukey-Kramer method for pairwisecomparisons.

Product Details

Edition: Vol. - No. Published: 11/01/2006 Number of Pages: 3File Size: 1 file , 310 KB